Irony: the opposite of wrinkly ([info]reseda_ptah) wrote,
@ 2007-10-04 00:05:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:story: the thing with feathers

Fake News: The Thing With Feathers, Chapter 9
Title: The Thing With Feathers, Chapter 9
Fandom: The Daily Show/The Colbert Report
Rating: PG
Words: ~1800
Disclaimer: Two.

For the Report characters: They and their universe are property of Stephen Colbert, the other Report writers, and of course Viacom. Not mine. Sue me not, please.

And for the real people, the poem:
Please, make no mistake:
these people aren't fake,
but what's said here is no more than fiction.
It only was writ
because we like their wit
and wisecracks, and pull-squints, and diction.
We don't mean to quibble,
but this can't be libel;
it's never implied to be real.
No disrespect's meant;
if you disapprove, then,
the back button's right up there. Deal.

Notes: Makes reference to this 2003 interview.

For the full table of contents, click here.

The Thing With Feathers
Chapter 9



(there.)


The real Jon had never been good at acting out fights. Even when Stephen was in-character, being as obnoxious and abusive as he could stand to be, and Jon put on that hangdog look he did so well, every heart in the audience swelling in sympathy -- even then, a second later Jon would laugh, and the spell would be broken.

He was a terrible actor because he was terrible at faking emotions, of any type. He was a bad romantic lead because he was uncomfortable with kissing his co-stars, and he was a bad scary villain because he couldn't feel proper anger at the people playing the heroes, and he was bad at faking fights with Stephen because the concept of the two of them fighting was so absurd that he couldn't keep a straight face for long.

But when Stephen thought back to all the obnoxious things he'd said in-character during their staged interactions -- My show is clearly more important than your show; I had another of those dreams where I had to do one of those stupid toss things; coming up next, meaningful commentary and un-stupid analysis; what self-loathing host of an alleged 'news show' cries himself to sleep at night? -- and then looked at the version of Jon sitting across from him and thought of him just taking it--

His stomach coiled.

Oh, there had been allusions to worse behavior off-camera, sexual harassment, gross negligence, all sorts of things; but these were vague references. Maybe in this universe they, like his references to his family, were not what they seemed.

But the verbal abuse of Jon had been played out on-screen in agonizingly minute detail.

"Why do you put up with it?" he whispered, anger -- at his character for doing it, and at himself for making it possible -- leeching the volume out of his voice. "How can you stand him?"

"But you play him," said Jon weakly. "You should understand better than anyone. How could you do that if you don't have any sympathy for him?"

"I -- it's comedy -- the comedy comes from the fact that he's such a screwed-up, unlikeable person -- I mean, I know he has his problems, but that doesn't change the fact that he's a complete bas--"

"Wait," said Jon, with surprising firmness. "Before you finish that, please remember that you are talking about my friend."

Stephen remembered it, and checked himself.

"He's a ... jerk," he amended, "and self-centered, and obnoxious, and he's amazingly flawed, and I know this for a fact because we write him that way."

"But don't you write us as being friends, too? Why do you do that?"

"Honestly? I think it mostly works because my Jon and I are friends underneath the roles, and our chemistry comes through. And because he's so good at playing straight man."

Jon started. "Isn't he?"

"Isn't he what?"

"...Straight," said Jon after a moment's hesitation.

"Oh! No, it's a comedy term, it means he's the normal one reacting to all the absurd things I do. Nothing to do with sexuality. But it's only funny because it's not real, which brings me back to -- why do you put up with it? How can someone like him have a friend like you?"

"But I don't understand the question," protested Jon. "People like him -- they're the people who most need friends like me!"


---------------------
---------------------

(here.)


It wasn't his office. How had he missed it before? It was so obvious. Not enough stars or stripes in the decor, for a start.

But the more he looked around, the more he found other differences. He found a change of clothes, neatly folded, and it wasn't a designer suit or even decent pants, just a generic T-shirt and chinos. The bottom drawer of his desk wasn't locked, which worried him until he opened it and found nothing but a stack of boring old papers. And on the desk itself...

Photos. Photos of a woman who looked just barely familiar, as if he had known her at some point but lost touch long ago. Photos of a not-quite-teenage girl, grinning, who looked exactly like pictures of his sister Margo at that age. Photos of two boys, one who had the strange woman's eyes set in a laughing face, and one who had a smile that he couldn't place, but he knew, he knew he had seen it before.

And then he found the group shot. They were standing in front of the fairy-tale castle that led to the Magic Kingdom, the kids wearing mouse ears, the woman holding the younger boy in her arms; and next to her, with his arm around her shoulder, was Stephen.

But it wasn't him. The man in the picture was in another generic T-shirt; he hadn't paid attention to the angle of his head, so the wonky ear was glaringly obvious; and he was grinning, not the authoritative smile that Stephen worked so hard on but a silly, face-splitting grin, the kind of grin Stephen had tried to avoid since he had realized how dorky it looked in his seventh grade school picture.

The smile of the little dark-haired boy was, in miniature, exactly that grin.

This is the version of me who owns this office. The version of me who belongs here. Only he's married, really married, and he has kids, kids who look like him.

And he doesn't have dirty pictures in a locked drawer, not even pictures of women. He's straight. He's happy.

And, oh God, I left my pills on the set.



---------------------
---------------------

(there.)


The outburst seemed to throw Stephen for a loop. He opened his mouth to reply, but nothing came out.

"This world," said Jon after a moment, "it's more complicated than you expected, isn't it?"

Stephen laughed dryly. "You can say that again."

We've been arguing past each other, thought Jon. We started from completely different assumptions. Here's the point we've been missing.

"You pretend to be the Stephen I know--" (my Stephen)-- "but you play him as this one-dimensional comedy character. And he isn't. To us, he isn't."

"He isn't all one-dimensional," admitted Stephen. "We've given him some backstory, some complications..."

"No, listen, it's even there in the basic idea. You said he was a stock character. How did you describe it?"

"Uh ... well-intentioned, poorly-informed, high-status idiot?"

"That's the one. And the first part of that, the first, is 'well-intentioned.' He doesn't do things to be cruel. He does them because he thinks they're the right thing to do -- or, worst-case scenario, because he doesn't realize that they're the wrong thing to do. He's badly informed, but that doesn't make him a bad person."

He paused. "Is this making sense?"

"Perfect sense. It's a great description of the general idea. But he's more than that, he's a takeoff on the loud conservative pundits -- he's angry, constantly, for no reason, just for the sake of being angry."

"You really think there's no reason?" asked Jon.

They had entered the city now, and there were lights and signs and multicolored billboards casting odd patterns of shadow on Stephen's face.

"Why?" he replied, as a stripe of green light passed over his forehead. "What do you think?"

Jon had never discussed this with anyone. Not his co-workers, not his friends, not even his wife. It was the only way to be absolutely sure that it would never get back to (his) Stephen. But his Stephen was gone, lost, worlds away, and there was no telling when (if?) (when) he would return.

"What I'm telling you now," he said, "it doesn't leave this car. It's strictly between us. You understand?"

"I won't breathe a word. I promise."

"All right."

He took a deep breath, closed his eyes.

"He is angry," he said, "because anger is the emotion of defense. When anger doesn't work, he goes for pity, which is sadness, crying. But they're all just defense mechanisms, to shut off how he actually feels about everything. He builds these walls to keep himself from showing his true emotions, because he's afraid they'll be seen as weaknesses.

"And he's so insecure about those emotions that he projects that onto everything around him; he thinks he's under attack from the whole world. He -- listen, he put baby carrots 'On Notice' because he claims they're 'trying to make him gay'. He feels threatened by baby carrots. To be defensive with an outlook like that -- it exhausts him. It's killing him by inches.

"He needs someone who won't put any pressure on his defenses. Someone with whom he can really feel safe. A friend who will let him be angry, or pitiful, or just plain wrong, without trying to change him. Because without that, he will never believe that anyone could accept him the way he is -- I mean the real him, the one under the shell.

"I catch glimpses of that Stephen, every once in a while. He's insecure, and he's scared, and he's lonely, but he cares about people, and he wants to do the right thing. He's a good person. He just doesn't know how to let it out."

He opened his eyes.

The Stephen next to him was staring at him with a look of such intensity that for a second Jon thought it was his own Stephen, not the mild-mannered moderate who played that role for the camera.

"What you said about anger and defense," he whispered, "where the hell did you get it?"

"I was a psych major. I guess a little of it stuck with me ... is that what you mean?"

"No. No, it's not. The way you put it -- it's something I said in an interview a couple of years ago. Almost verbatim."

Jon smiled. "Talking about your character? Then you do understand him!"

Stephen shook his head. "Not about my character."

"Who, then?"

"Me."



(44 comments) - (Post a new comment)

This is up early today! *squees*
[info]violent_rabbit
2007-10-04 04:20 am UTC (link)
*Flails*


*FLAILS SOME MORE*


THAT END. You kill me so good.


and And he doesn't have dirty pictures in a locked drawer, not even pictures of women. He's straight. He's happy.

And, oh God, I left my pills on the set.


XD and 0_0 and 8:( <--- meant to be tears

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: This is up early today! *squees*
[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 04:36 am UTC (link)
So glad this hit the right buttons.

For future reference, ";_;" is a useful crying face.

And thank you ♥

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: This is up early today! *squees*
[info]violent_rabbit
2007-10-04 04:39 am UTC (link)
Thank you I knew there was something easier! My attempt did look a little like a person with a bra on their head.

I have so much woobie love for "Jon" now. Swelling through my heartstrings it is.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(Deleted post)

[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 04:46 am UTC (link)
I love it when "Jon" (or Jon, for that matter) gets assertive. I'm glad that translated. And it's wonderful to hear that this is illuminating re: "Stephen".

Thank you ♥

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ediblestars
2007-10-04 04:38 am UTC (link)
God. This. God, this is perfection, and you are just... defining it in this fandom. I know that's totally incoherent--I'm sorry--but I want you to know, I don't know what time zone you're in but for me these are posted usually around 12:40 AM or so, and I... have, honestly, been staying up to read them. It's that riveting. You are awesome. And I'm sorry for the metric shit-tons of GUSHGUSHGUSH in this comment, but you deserve it, K? K. ♥

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ediblestars
2007-10-04 04:39 am UTC (link)
*12:30, not that it matters that much

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 04:51 am UTC (link)
We're in the same time zone; I post these as soon as I can when I get back from watching TCR ^_^

You're too kind. Honestly, I was in a mood where I needed some gushing, so thank you.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]nacchi_camui
2007-10-04 04:59 am UTC (link)
"People like him -- they're the people who most need friends like me!"
Yes ;_;

As much as I also consider "Stephen" the way you make "Jon" describe him here, I never realized Stephen ever talked about himself the same way. My brain seriously failed to make the connection between Stephen's depressing youth and "Stephen"'s quite depressing way of life (durr). That's one extra interesting point in all the ones you put in that fic.
And I love how Stephen tries to understand the others' friendship. He's kinda treating "Stephen" like Jon does, actually (which makes me feel better about Jon's reactions towards him, for some reason)

...that wasn't really concrit because I just said what you wrote but..yeah, still can't wait for the next part :D

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 05:23 am UTC (link)
I thought of the line "anger is the emotion of defense" when I was writing "Jon"'s defense, but only when I looked up the interview did I realize how much of it was so fitting. It reveals a lot about what Stephen thinks about psychology in general, so it makes sense that he incorporates those ideas into "Stephen".

There are definite parallels between the ways Jon and Stephen are treating "Stephen". And change is on the way.

If you don't have concrit, then uncritical meta does just as well =3 Thank you!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]roffleatyou
2007-10-04 05:22 am UTC (link)
Hahaha I feel guilty because I adore this story, but I never comment on anything.

I love how you characterize "Jon" and "Stephen"

I'm so used to seeing them as the one-dimensional characters on the show that it's fascinating to read about your take on them in the context of the rest of their world.

And now I keep watching Jon on the Daily Show and going OMG! I never paid attention to how he is so passive and such, but yeah.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 05:36 am UTC (link)
Thank you for coming out of the woodwork! It's so cool to hear from people I didn't know were reading.

I don't think "Stephen" is one-dimensional on the show (and someday I will do an extensive piece of meta using video clips to demonstrate this). "Jon" is sort of a one-dimensional layer on top of the real Jon, but I took that as meaning that they are very similar, and just copied a lot of Jon's traits into "Jon" here.

A lot of people have said this is helping them understand "Stephen", so I'm glad it can give insights into "Jon" too =)

And thank you!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]gaiafaye
2007-10-04 05:24 am UTC (link)
I'm enjoying the meta, I really am, and I'm interesting to see Stephen relate himself to his character, but are "Jon" and Stephen ever getting out of the car? ;)

The bit with "Jon" not understanding the term "straight man" was amusing and perhaps revealing.

And thank you once again for keeping me up with your awesome when I should be sleeping. >(

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gaiafaye
2007-10-04 05:27 am UTC (link)
Er, I'm interested to see. Though I guess I could be interesting to watch when I read this story too, though, what with my variety of intrigued, amused, and sympathetic expressions.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 05:37 am UTC (link)
It's a half-hour drive, and they haven't spent it all in silence this time around. But they'll get out in the next chapter.

Picked up on that, did you? ^_~ (Not exactly subtle, was I?)

My pleasure!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]shruti_42
2007-10-04 06:12 am UTC (link)
THE LAST LINE.

This is so good. Like, best-piece-of-fanfic-I've-ever-read good. Although, to be fair, I don't read all that much fanfiction, but still. This is amazing. And so...illuminating. Really, fantastically done.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 12:02 pm UTC (link)
You're too kind. Thank you.

Also, re: the baby carrots: They're small, tender, and phallic.

"But Erin," you may be thinking, "baby carrots are not that phallic! I mean, they're longer than they are wide, and rounded, but that's about it!"

To which I would reply: "When you work very hard to repress feelings, but the feelings are too strong to erase, you end up projecting them onto outside things so that you can blame those things for being the cause of the feelings. And 'Stephen' is repressing very, very hard. His desires are going to be projected onto anything that is so much as the merest hint phallic."

(I also think it hints that his tastes run toward the small -- not necessarily in that specific area, but overall. Which is either a holdover from his days of voicing Reducto, or a sign regarding "Jon".)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]shruti_42
2007-10-04 12:58 pm UTC (link)
Hahaha, that was a very deep analysis of the entire baby carrots thing. Thanks.
.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]shruti_42
2007-10-04 06:35 am UTC (link)
Okay...also? I've never gotten the baby carrots thing. Is there some obvious innuendo that I'm missing? Or what?

(Reply to this)


[info]foureyedsnail
2007-10-04 07:27 am UTC (link)
*cries* I am so sorry I cannot give this the attention it deserves; I just spent ~5 hours on a chem problem set and there are many more sets to go. So please forgive me if my reviewing is sparse. I still sneak in between pH calculations to read.

The end was positively eerie. Unexpected parallels! Awesomeness!

The "straight man" line is devilishly good. I use that expression a lot with people, and most folks jump to exactly the same meaning as "Jon" did, which entails extra explanation. Good times. Perfectly reasonable for someone who is *not* into comedy. :P :P

Again, I apologize, fantastic job, and off to work I go.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 12:16 pm UTC (link)
Not a problem! This will always be here when the chemistry is done.

So glad you like that end, and that you, like Stephen, think it's perfectly normal for the non-comedian "Jon" to make that mistake =3

No worries, and thank you!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kahvi
2007-10-04 08:41 am UTC (link)
OK. At work and stressing like crazy, so just a quick comment for now - awesome. More later, because I have a lot to say about this one! :D

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 12:16 pm UTC (link)
Thank you, and I look forward to it!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]kahvi
2007-10-11 01:33 pm UTC (link)
I am so behind on commenting.

What made me sit up and go "hah!" in this one was "Jon" basically making the point that he's Stephen's friend because Stephen somebody has to be. And that struck me as so incredibly - and I'm sorry for keeping making RD references - Listerine! I wrote a story where Lister makes exactly that point about Rimmer; he's unlikeable, but Lister (tries) to befriend him because somebody has to. "Jon" is Listerine! Well, that shouldn't come as a huge surprise, as both Jon and "Jon" are all about doing The Right Thing and fairness. Still, it made me connect with him a whole lot more.

Elegantly written, this. *rushes on to next chapter*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-11 01:44 pm UTC (link)
The more I think about it, the more I suspect my writing of "Stephen" and Jon is influenced by the fact that my dad corrupted me with Red Dwarf at an early age. There are the obvious differences -- Jon is a lot neater than Lister, for instance (although now that I think about it, "Stephen" probably thinks of him as slobby by comparison) -- but the things I admire in Lister are things I admire in "Jon".

So glad this is coming together for you =D

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]stellar_dust
2007-10-04 12:19 pm UTC (link)
Oooooooooh. I have to go to work now. But, ooooooooooohhh!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 12:26 pm UTC (link)
That sounds promising.

No worries; this will still be here for more commenting when you get back!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]stellar_dust
2007-10-09 02:30 am UTC (link)
Ok, I'm back, and I'm trying to read and comment before TDS starts! Wish me luck. XD

Oooooooooo, indeeeeeed. I get Stephen's issues now. (I think! I shall have to read the next chapters and see!) He needs to understand that he and "Stephen" aren't as .. discrete as he thinks they are! I can see him failing to consciously recognize that. *nods*


Bits that I loved:

"Before you finish that, please remember that you are talking about my friend."

Yay, "Jon"!

"Isn't he straight?" XD

Poor, poor "Stephen" with the photo and without his pills! (Maybe his reaction to meeting Evie was the turning point between quotes and no-quotes? Part of it, anyway.)

"Jon" the psych major! Yay.


(The only concrit I could possibly give is that the characters seemed undeveloped in the first few chapters. I know that's kind of the point - but still. I'll reread it all when it's completely posted, and it will probably be better with no wait between chapters!)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-09 04:20 am UTC (link)
I considered having Stephen and "Stephen" turn out to be the same person with some key difference along the way. (His meeting of Amy and Paul would be a more likely turning point; in our world, they got him to stop being so serious.) But that doesn't explain why Eric is Bobby, or why "Stephen" has such strong issues stretching all the way back to childhood. So that was out.

Without the issue of other characters like Bobby/Paul/Charlene/etc., I think "Stephen" could have been plausible as Stephen if he were exposed to too much lead as a child.

(Depressing possibility, innit?)

The characters definitely get more developed as the story goes on. That's partly because they're changing and growing throughout, and partly because by this point I've just had more time to develop them ^_^;

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]girlofjuly
2007-10-04 01:43 pm UTC (link)
I love this :] I'm especially loving "Jon" right now, hee.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 01:48 pm UTC (link)
"Jon" finally shows his spine. Glad you like!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

We're already halfway over? NOOOOOOO!!!!
[info]winged_mammal
2007-10-04 04:16 pm UTC (link)
"He needs someone who won't put any pressure on his defenses. Someone with whom he can really feel safe."

That line explained a lot about "Stephen" to me - maybe because it explained why he reacted so strongly when Jon revealed how he jumped him earlier. I've said it before and so has just about everyone else, but I just can't say how much I love how deep into everyone's psyches you're getting. It's endlessly fascinating stuff.

And that scene when "Stephen" was looking at the photos on Stephen's desk was somehow hauntingly beautiful.

*waits for the next chapter*

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Think of it this way: there's half still to look forward to!
[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 06:01 pm UTC (link)
Oh, excellent connection. "Jon" has never explained this logic of his to "Stephen", but on some level "Stephen" recognizes that he's safe with "Jon", and relies on it more than he knows. Being outed by a person who, until that moment, he thought was "Jon" -- that hit too close to the heart. It's like having a break-in at your house. It cuts straight to the center of your sense of security.

That central scene took a lot of care to write. I'm glad it came out effectively.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]tomephile
2007-10-04 04:52 pm UTC (link)
Can I just say, the characterisation in your fiction and the way you balance the humour and pathos is just...marvellous. I have nothing constructive to say, I'm sorry, I'm terrible at that kind of criticism. I hope you don't mind plain old complimentary posting, but _lady_vanilla_, smilesawakeyou and you are just the absolute best writers in this fandom. Thank you for the stories. *eagerly waits for more*

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 06:34 pm UTC (link)
Believe me, I will never say no to unqualified praise.

There are other writers I adore, but I agree that those two are great, and I'm so glad you like this story that much ♥

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]imoldfashioned
2007-10-04 05:44 pm UTC (link)
Another fascinating chapter. Stephen realizing how his character has treated "Jon", "Stephen" investigating Stephen's office--his reactions told so much about him without saying it directly (good job), but my favorite was the last exchange. I'm so glad I can depend on an update of this every other day, it is wonderful.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 08:04 pm UTC (link)
That central scene was a delicate job, but that's just the effect I wanted it to have.

Glad you approve of "Jon" finally showing some backbone, too ^_~

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]belmanoir
2007-10-04 09:49 pm UTC (link)
The bottom drawer of his desk wasn't locked, which worried him until he opened it and found nothing but a stack of boring old papers.

bwahaha! aw, poor "stephen." i love jon pointing out that he feels "threatened by baby carrots," and how that takes a toll on a person.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 10:01 pm UTC (link)
And so the poor "Stephen" trend continues.

For all his faults, I have to admire "Stephen": he feels that threatened, that constantly, and he hasn't (yet) fallen apart.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]belmanoir
2007-10-04 10:11 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, his force of will is amazing. I mean, it'd have to be, to keep him from noticing how ridiculous he's being.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-04 10:22 pm UTC (link)
I think some of that can be chalked up to sheer obliviousness, but he definitely has epic powers of denial.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]rikimae
2007-10-05 03:06 pm UTC (link)
umm.. wow.... just.. wow....

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-05 04:28 pm UTC (link)
*bows* Thank you.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]darkfaery1
2007-10-09 02:35 am UTC (link)
Playing catch up again...First I have to take exception to 'real Stephen's' opinion about Jon's acting. He's not Anthony Hopkins, but I personally don't think he's terrible either, though I have yet to see Death to Smoochy.

I'm glad Jon defended 'Stephen" and I was very intriqued by Stephen's realization that he and 'Stephen' have their emotional defenses in common. I can't wait to find out what or who is behind the switch.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]reseda_ptah
2007-10-09 04:27 am UTC (link)
I haven't seen Smoochy either, but I've seen him in other things, and I've heard him talk about the way he acts. He can't get into the heads of his characters. The discomfort with kissing female co-stars is real. And you've seen for yourself how he can't keep a straight face when acting across from Stephen.

The reasons Jon cites for his bad acting are the reasons I think of myself as a terrible actor, which may color my writing...

Anyway. Onward!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(44 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…